BuzzyBuzz

    Everything you want to know just here you will find

    What Mick Mulvaney's Latest Legal Woes Mean For Trump's Impeachment | The 11th Hour | MSNBC

    /
    /
    /
    19 Views

    >>> THE COMMAND FOR >>> THE COMMAND FOR INVESTIGATION BY THE DEMOCRATS INVESTIGATION BY THE DEMOCRATS WAS PART OF THE REASON TO WAS PART OF THE REASON TO WITHHOLD FUNDING FOR UKRAINE? WITHHOLD FUNDING FOR UKRAINE? >> THE LOOK BACK TO WHAT >> THE LOOK BACK TO WHAT HAPPENED IN 2016 CERTAINLY WAS HAPPENED IN 2016 CERTAINLY WAS PART OF THE THING THAT HE WAS PART OF THE THING THAT HE WAS WORRIED ABOUT IN CORRUPTION TO WORRIED ABOUT IN CORRUPTION TO THAT NATION AND THAT IS THAT NATION AND THAT IS ABSOLUTELY APPROPRIATE ABSOLUTELY APPROPRIATE

    >> IN WITHHOLDING THE FUNDING? >> IN WITHHOLDING THE FUNDING? >> YEAH >> YEAH >> REMEMBER THE DAY THAT AIRED >> REMEMBER THE DAY THAT AIRED AND EVERYONE WATCHING WAS SAYING AND EVERYONE WATCHING WAS SAYING DID HE JUST, ACTING CHIEF OF DID HE JUST, ACTING CHIEF OF STAFF MICK MULVANEY DID STAFF MICK MULVANEY DID BACKTRACK FROM THAT HOURS LATER BACKTRACK FROM THAT HOURS LATER ESSENTIALLY SAYING HE DID NOT ESSENTIALLY SAYING HE DID NOT SAY WHAT EVERYONE HEARD HIM SAY SAY WHAT EVERYONE HEARD HIM SAY LIVE AND ON TELEVISION, USING LIVE AND ON TELEVISION, USING HIS WORDS HIS WORDS THIS EVENING, IT WAS MULVANEY’S THIS EVENING, IT WAS MULVANEY’S LAWYERS REVERSING COURSE, FILING LAWYERS REVERSING COURSE, FILING A MOTION AFTER CUKUPPERMAN WAS A MOTION AFTER CUKUPPERMAN WAS SUBPOENAED

    SUBPOENAED LAST WEEK THE HOUSE WITHDREW LAST WEEK THE HOUSE WITHDREW THAT SUBPOENA BUT MULVANEY TRIED THAT SUBPOENA BUT MULVANEY TRIED TO JOIN KUPPERMAN’S LAWSUIT ANY TO JOIN KUPPERMAN’S LAWSUIT ANY HOW HOW EARLIER TODAY KUPPERMAN’S EARLIER TODAY KUPPERMAN’S LAWYERS ASKED THE JUDGE TO TURN LAWYERS ASKED THE JUDGE TO TURN MULVANEY DOWN MULVANEY DOWN

    AFTER SAYING WHAT HE DID ON LIVE AFTER SAYING WHAT HE DID ON LIVE TELEVISION, MULVANEY MAY HAVE TELEVISION, MULVANEY MAY HAVE GIVEN UP OR WAIVED ANY CLAIM HE GIVEN UP OR WAIVED ANY CLAIM HE HAS TO IMMUNITY TO SUBPOENA AND HAS TO IMMUNITY TO SUBPOENA AND THEY ADDED THAT ALLOWING THEY ADDED THAT ALLOWING MULVANEY INTO THE CASE COULD BOG MULVANEY INTO THE CASE COULD BOG IT DOWN IN NEW ISSUES THAT WOULD IT DOWN IN NEW ISSUES THAT WOULD DRAG IT OUT WHEN IT WAS LIKELY DRAG IT OUT WHEN IT WAS LIKELY TO BE DISMISSED BECAUSE THE TO BE DISMISSED BECAUSE THE HOUSE WITHDREW KUPPERMAN’S HOUSE WITHDREW KUPPERMAN’S SUBPOENA SUBPOENA WE NEED A LAWYER, IS THAT WHAT WE NEED A LAWYER, IS THAT WHAT YOU’RE THINKING RIGHT ABOUT NOW? YOU’RE THINKING RIGHT ABOUT NOW? WITH THE NEW SCHOOL HERE IN NEW WITH THE NEW SCHOOL HERE IN NEW YORK, CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN YORK, CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT’S GOING ON AND MORE THAN WHAT’S GOING ON AND MORE THAN THAT, TO QUOTE AL GORE, WHAT THAT, TO QUOTE AL GORE, WHAT CONTROLLING LEGAL AUTHORITY IS CONTROLLING LEGAL AUTHORITY IS GOING TO TELL THE WHITE HOUSE GOING TO TELL THE WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF YOUR APPEALS ARE CHIEF OF STAFF YOUR APPEALS ARE OVER, THEY’RE DONE, YOU HAVE TO OVER, THEY’RE DONE, YOU HAVE TO COME IN AND TALK TO US COME IN AND TALK TO US THIS IS THE UNITED STATES

    THIS IS THE UNITED STATES >> THERE IS A LOT TO UNPACK >> THERE IS A LOT TO UNPACK HERE, AS YOU KNOW, BRIAN HERE, AS YOU KNOW, BRIAN THE FIRST OF WHICH IS, YOU KNOW, THE FIRST OF WHICH IS, YOU KNOW, THE EXPANSIVE NATURE OF THIS THE EXPANSIVE NATURE OF THIS WHITE HOUSE SUGGESTING THAT WHITE HOUSE SUGGESTING THAT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES CAN UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES CAN CONGRESS GET ACCESS TO ANY — CONGRESS GET ACCESS TO ANY — >> AS HIGHWAY AI BLANKET RULE >> AS HIGHWAY AI BLANKET RULE

    >> ANYONE, EVEN COREY >> ANYONE, EVEN COREY LEWANDOWSKI THAT NEVER WORKED LEWANDOWSKI THAT NEVER WORKED FOR THE WHITE HOUSE FOR THE WHITE HOUSE >> YEAH >> YEAH >> IT’S TAKEN SUCH AN EXTREME >> IT’S TAKEN SUCH AN EXTREME POSITION

    POSITION THE THING THAT IS HAPPENING THE THING THAT IS HAPPENING HERE, THOUGH, WITH KUPPERMAN, HERE, THOUGH, WITH KUPPERMAN, WHO WE SHOULD THINK OF AS WHO WE SHOULD THINK OF AS KUPPERMAN AND BOLTON, RIGHT? KUPPERMAN AND BOLTON, RIGHT? THEY HAVE THE SAME ATTORNEY THEY HAVE THE SAME ATTORNEY THEY’RE IN A DIFFERENT POSITION THEY’RE IN A DIFFERENT POSITION THAN MICK MULVANEY THAN MICK MULVANEY

    FIRST OF ALL, ALL THE WITNESSES FIRST OF ALL, ALL THE WITNESSES ARE SUGGESTING THAT THEY AT ARE SUGGESTING THAT THEY AT LEAST JOHN BOLTON, WERE RAISING LEAST JOHN BOLTON, WERE RAISING THE RED FLAGS THAT THIS WAS THE RED FLAGS THAT THIS WAS APPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR APPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR MICK MULVANEY — MICK MULVANEY — >> FURTHER IMPLICATED TODAY >> FURTHER IMPLICATED TODAY >> UP TO HIS EYEBALLS

    >> UP TO HIS EYEBALLS NOT ONLY BY VIRTUE OF SAYING NOT ONLY BY VIRTUE OF SAYING NOTHING WRONG HERE AND YES, NOTHING WRONG HERE AND YES, ABSOLUTELY DONALD TRUMP WAS ABSOLUTELY DONALD TRUMP WAS GOING BACKWARDS TO THE ORIGINS GOING BACKWARDS TO THE ORIGINS OF WHAT ESSENTIALLY BECAME THE OF WHAT ESSENTIALLY BECAME THE MUELLER PROBE, BUT THAT HE MUELLER PROBE, BUT THAT HE HIMSELF HAS BEEN IMPLICATED IN HIMSELF HAS BEEN IMPLICATED IN BOTH STOPPING MILITARY AID BOTH STOPPING MILITARY AID APPROVED BY CONGRESS APPROVED BY CONGRESS WE’VE HEARD EVIDENCE NOW THAT WE’VE HEARD EVIDENCE NOW THAT LAWYERS WERE RAISING QUESTIONS LAWYERS WERE RAISING QUESTIONS OF WHETHER THE OMB COULD EVEN DO OF WHETHER THE OMB COULD EVEN DO THAT LEGALLY THAT LEGALLY

    THINK ABOUT THAT THINK ABOUT THAT THAT’S ESSENTIALLY THE ARGUMENT THAT’S ESSENTIALLY THE ARGUMENT THEY’RE MAKING THEY’RE MAKING THEY ARE REALLY IN DIFFERENT THEY ARE REALLY IN DIFFERENT POSITIONS

    POSITIONS BUT THEY SAID FORGET THAT, THE BUT THEY SAID FORGET THAT, THE DON McGAHN CASE IS GOING MUCH DON McGAHN CASE IS GOING MUCH MORE QUICKLY MORE QUICKLY WE WANT THIS TO GO FAST AND WANT WE WANT THIS TO GO FAST AND WANT A RULING FROM A COURT THAT SAYS A RULING FROM A COURT THAT SAYS THIS ENTIRE LINE OF OBSTRUCTION THIS ENTIRE LINE OF OBSTRUCTION OF CONGRESS IS A PROBLEM AND OF CONGRESS IS A PROBLEM AND WITNESSES HAVE TO START WITNESSES HAVE TO START TESTIFYING TESTIFYING

    >> AS YOU KNOW, COURTROOM >> AS YOU KNOW, COURTROOM LAWYERS HAVE TO ENGAGE IN A LAWYERS HAVE TO ENGAGE IN A LITTLE PERFORMANCE ART LITTLE PERFORMANCE ART ARE YOU CONVINCED THIS IS A ARE YOU CONVINCED THIS IS A STORY THEY CAN TELL STARTING STORY THEY CAN TELL STARTING WITNESS MORNING, THEY CAN TELL WITNESS MORNING, THEY CAN TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? ABSOLUTELY AND CAN HONE IN ON ABSOLUTELY AND CAN HONE IN ON THE PERSONAL GAIN OF THE THE PERSONAL GAIN OF THE PRESIDENT, THAT THIS ISN’T ABOUT PRESIDENT, THAT THIS ISN’T ABOUT NATIONAL SECURITY BECAUSE NATIONAL SECURITY BECAUSE NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS OF NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS OF THE COUNTRY WERE TO GET THAT THE COUNTRY WERE TO GET THAT MILITARY AID TO UKRAINE MILITARY AID TO UKRAINE >> DEFEND THEM AGAINST RUSSIA

    >> DEFEND THEM AGAINST RUSSIA >> TO DEFEND THEM AGAINST RUSSIA >> TO DEFEND THEM AGAINST RUSSIA IN A HOT WAR THAT ALL THE IN A HOT WAR THAT ALL THE EXPERTS ACROSS THE POLITICAL EXPERTS ACROSS THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM AGREED SHOULD HAPPEN SPECTRUM AGREED SHOULD HAPPEN PUTTING HIS PERSONAL INTEREST PUTTING HIS PERSONAL INTEREST AHEAD OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AHEAD OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE COUNTRY IS ABUSE OF POWER OF THE COUNTRY IS ABUSE OF POWER AND THAT STORY IS ONE ANY AND THAT STORY IS ONE ANY AMERICAN CAN UNDERSTAND IF THEY AMERICAN CAN UNDERSTAND IF THEY METHODICALLY AS I THINK THEY CAN METHODICALLY AS I THINK THEY CAN WITH BILL TAYLOR’S TESTIMONY AND WITH BILL TAYLOR’S TESTIMONY AND THE TESTIMONY OF OTHERS FOCUS

    Source: Youtube

    This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar

    %d bloggers like this: