BuzzyBuzz

    Everything you want to know just here you will find

    Victor Davis Hanson: Democrats trying to impeach Trump over 'thought crimes'

    /
    /
    /
    14 Views

    BELIEVE IT OR NOT, THEY ARE STILL PUSHING THE MUELLER REPORT GET TO THAT SHORTLY

    BUT FIRST, REPUBLICANS FIRED UP ABOUT THE FACT THAT MOST OF THE EARLY WITNESSES LACK FIRST-HAND KNOWLEDGE, LEAVING SEVERAL OF THEM TO LIE ON ASSUMPTION, PRESUMPTION, AND SPECULATION >> MY ASSUMPTION IS HE DID IT IN A CLOSED-DOOR SPECULATION IT WAS A PRESUMPTION SO PRESSURE WAS BROUGHT TO BEAR ON THEM, CORRECT? >> I BELIEVE SO >> THEY ARE A NUMBER OF EVENTS YOU ARE INVESTIGATING THAT I CANNOT BRING FIRST-HAND KNOWLEDGE

    THESE INCLUDE PRESIDENT TRUMP'S JULY 25TH 20 TIGHTENING 202019 CALL WITHPRESIDENT ZELENS 202019 CALL WITHPRESIDENT ZELENY 202019 CALL WITHPRESIDENT ZELEN >> MY FIRST DAD WROTE A NEW OP-ED SAYING "ALLEGED BAD THOUGHTS" ARE NOT CRIMES, OUTSIDE OF GEORGE ORWELL'S DYSTOPIAN NOVEL "1984" IT'S VICTOR DAVID HANSON, JOINS ME NOW GOOD TO SEE YOU >> GOOD TO SEE YOU, ED

    >> Ed: YOU MAKE THE CASE THAT DEMOCRATS HAVE TO COME UP WITH SOMETHING BETTER THAN "A THOUGHT CRIME" WHAT DO YOU MEAN ABOUT THAT? >> IS NOT AGAINST THE LAW, AT LEAST IT WASN'T UNDER THE US CONSTITUTION TO THINK SOMETHING IF I WANT TO THINK ABOUT SPEEDING AT 80 MILES PER HOUR AND I TALK ABOUT THINKING ABOUT IT BUT I ACTUALLY DON'T, I'M NOT GUILTY OF ANYTHING OTHER THAN HARBORING A BAD THOUGHTS

    TRUMP MAY OR MAY NOT, WE DON'T REALLY KNOW, THERE IS EVIDENCE SUGGESTING HE DIDN'T COME OUT DELAYING AID AND EIGHT WAS DELAYED, BUT IT WASN'T CAUGHT OFF THAT'S NOT A CRIME THERE WAS A HE DIDN'T FORCE THEBUYERS OF ANY HE DIDN'T FORCE THEBUYERS OF ANO HE DIDN'T FORCE THEBUYERS OF ANY HE DIDN'T FORCE THEBUYERS OF ANI HE DIDN'T FORCE THEBUYERS OF ANN HE DIDN'T FORCE THEBUYERS OF ANU HE DIDN'T FORCE THEBUYERS OF ANR HE DIDN'T FORCE THEBUYERS OF ANI HE DIDN'T FORCE THEBUYERS OF ANE HE DIDN'T FORCE THEBUYERS OF AN, DIDN'T INTERFERE IN THE SANDS HE DIDN'T DOANYTHING LIKE IT DID HE DIDN'T DOANYTHING LIKE IT DI' HE DIDN'T DOANYTHING LIKE IT DIT HE DIDN'T DOANYTHING LIKE IT DIR HE DIDN'T DOANYTHING LIKE IT DIA HE DIDN'T DOANYTHING LIKE IT DIL HE DIDN'T DOANYTHING LIKE IT DIY COLLUDE WITH THE RUSSIANS >> Ed: ON THE FIRST POINT, WHETHER THERE IS A THOUGHT OR NOT, WHEN YOU HAVE OMB BEING COUNTERS, THEY WERE GOING AROUND DEBATING BEYOND EMAILS OUT OF THE TESTIMONY, SAYING IS THIS LEGAL TO HOLD IT UP, IT WASN'T JUST A THOUGHT IT MAY HAVE ONLY BEEN DAYS ARE A COUPLE OF WEEKS, BUT THE AIDE WAS HELD UP

    >> IS NOT AGAINST THE LAW TO HOLD UP AID EVERY ADMINISTRATION HAS THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE, CROSS-EXAMINE, DOUBLETHINK ABOUT THE AID FOR A COUPLE OF REASONS MAYBE THEY THOUGHT IT WAS CORRUPT THEY SAID UKRAINE COULD BE TRUSTED UNTIL THEY HAD VERIFICATION THE NEW PRESIDENT WAS RELIABLE MAYBE THEY THOUGHT DONALD TRUMP WAS TOO SENSITIVE ABOUT GETTING AID TO ANYBODY

    THESE ARE SIGNIFICANT REASONS TO DELAY OR INTERRUPT, BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS HE DIDN'T CUT IT IN THE END IF YOU'RE GOING TO CONVICT PEOPLE OF THOUGHT CRIMES WERE CONSIDERING CUTTING, WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF YOU SAID, WELL, BARACK OBAMA NEVER GAVE THEM LEGAL AID AND A LOT OF PEOPLE DIED BECAUSE OF THAT? BUT WE AREN'T IMPEACHING BARACK OBAMA FOR THAT THAT'S HIS PREROGATIVE AS A PRESIDENT TO SAY I'M NOT GOING TO GIVE ANY LEGAL AID TO THE UKRAINIANS I DON'T CARE ABOUT GIVING THEM LETHAL AID REPUBLICANS IT AND SAY WE ARE IMPEACHING THE PRESIDENT, DIDN'T GIVE HIM LETHAL AID

    >> Ed: TO YOUR POINT WHAT ABOUT THE FACT THAT JERRY NADLER WHO IS GOING TO TAKE OVER FOR ADAM SCHIFF BECAUSE IT'S GOT OVER TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAYS IN HIS LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT, BY THE WAY, WE ARE STILL LOOKING AT ALLEGED OBSTRUCTION IN THE MUELLER REPORT AND THAT COULD BE AN ARTICLE OF IMPEACHMENT? I THOUGHT WE ALREADY DEALT WITH THAT >> WE DID THE ONLY FOUND THERE WAS NO COLLUSION, ROBERT MUELLER SAID THAT THERE WAS NO ACTIONABLE EVIDENCE THAT WOULD LEAD TO AN INDICTMENT FOR THE PRESIDENT AND WHEN HE WAS QUERIED ON THAT, THAT WAS NOT BECAUSE HE WAS THE PRESIDENT IF HE HAD BEEN ANYBODY ELSE, HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN INDICTED BECAUSE THERE WASN'T THE EVIDENCE WHAT IS THE SUBTEXT OF ALL OF THIS? THERE IS NO NEW WITNESS IS FOR THERE IS NO DOCUMENTARIAN EVIDENCE

    THERE IS NO SPECIAL COUNSEL THERE IS NO LEON JAWORSKI, THERE'S NO KEN STARR REPORT UNLESS THEY CAN BRING IN A MARQUEE WITNESS LIKE JOHN BOLTON WHO HAS NEW INFORMATION OF DIRECT TESTIMONY IN CONVERSATION WITH THE PRESIDENT, THERE IS NOTHING THEY KNOW IT THERE IS AN IRONY HERE, BECAUSE WE WERE TOLD THAT NOTHING HAD BEEN HARMED OR IMPERILED THE AMERICAN ELECTORAL PROCESS LIKE COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS, AND BARACK OBAMA AS HE WAS EXITING OFFICE SAID TO DONALD TRUMP, QUIT WHINING ABOUT THE ELECTION ELECTIONS

    THAT COMPLAINT IMPERILS THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS WHAT HAVE WE HEARD SINCE THEN? WE'VE HAD HILLARY CLINTON QUESTION THE INTEGRITY, NANCY PELOSI GOT A FUND-RAISER QUESTIONING THE INTEGRITY OF 2020 AL GREEN, CONGRESSMAN, AOC, AND CONGRESSWOMAN HAVE BOTH SAID WITHOUT IMPEACHMENT, DONALD TRUMP WILL BE ELECTED THAT'S NOT A GOOD THING AND THERE IN THEIR VIEW WE ARE NOT A BRITISH PARLIAMENT TERRY GOVERNMENT

    YOU DO NOT USE IMPEACHMENT TO PRECLUDE OR PREEMPT A NEW ELECTION IT'S DONE MORE HARM TO THE INTEGRITY OF THE AMERICAN ELECTORAL PROCESS IN ANY ACCESS OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION >> Ed: THE LAST QUESTION, TO LIVE ARE THEY JUST TRYING TO STOP THEM AT ALL COSTS? LOOK AT THIS FROM FAREED ZAKARIA THEY SAY, PEOPLE OFTEN ASK THEMSELVES WHAT THE FOUNDERS WITH THINK OF AMERICA TODAY THE GREATER SHOCK TO THEM WOULD BE THE INCREDIBLE GROWTH OF PRESIDENTIAL POWER, TENSIONS OF PROFOUND DEMOCRATIC CHANGE FROM A FIERCE POLITICAL BACKLASH, AND THE PRESIDENCY THAT REFUSES TO BE CHECKED

    MY OPTIMISM IS WEARING THIN WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT THOUGHT OUT THERE ON THE LEFT THAT YOU SHOULDN'T BE OPTIMISTIC ABOUT THE FUTURE OF AMERICA? >> THEY APPARENTLY AREN'T OPTIMISTIC BECAUSE THEY TRY TO USE A LOT OF EXTRACONSTITUTIONAL MEANS TO CHANGE THE NATURE OF THE REPUBLIC THE ONLY THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE EFFORT, VOTING MACHINES, 20 FOR THE AMENDMENT, MUELLER, CHALLENGING THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, SIX OF THE 14 CHALLENGE COLLEGE, SIX OF THE 14 CHALLENGS WANT TO PACK THE SUPREME COURT THERE IS A FEELER MOOD IN THE COUNTRY THAT THE DEMOCRATIC AGENDA, THE PROGRESSIVE AGENDA, DOESN'T APPEAL TO 51% OF THE VOTERS THEY DO NOT WANT REPARATIONS, THEY DO NOT WANT THE GREEN DEAL, THEY DO NOT WANT MEDICARE FOR ALL

    IN LIEU OF A CONVINCING MESSAGE AND CONVINCING MESSAGE IS, THEY ARE ATTACKING THE PROCESS AND SAYING DONALD TRUMP CANNOT BE PRESIDENT, WE WILL DO THIS AND THIS AND THIS TO STOP IT BUT ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS HE'S ELECTED PRESIDENT, HE IS OUR COMMANDER IN CHIEF WE AREN'T GOING TO USE TERMS LIKE THE RESISTANCE BUT WE ARE IN THE OPPOSITION AND WE HAVE A COUNTER AGENDA, HERE IT IS LET THE VOTERS DECIDE IN LESS THAN A YEAR THEY LOST CONFIDENCE IN THE

    Source: Youtube

    This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar

    %d bloggers like this: