BuzzyBuzz

    Everything you want to know just here you will find

    Rep. Ratcliffe: This is why Dems are gunning for an impeachment vote

    /
    /
    /
    15 Views

    REPORT, COMPLETES ITS INVESTIGATION BRET? >> Bret: THAT WAS FASCINATING

    JOHN ROBERTS, THANK YOU LET'S GET SOME INSIGHT INTO THE IMPEACHMENT HEARING AND THE IG REPORT FROM TEXAS ARE PUBLIC AND CONGRESSMAN JOHN RATCLIFFE, WHO SERVES ON BOTH THE INTELLIGENCEA SERVES ON BOTH THE INTELLIGENCED SERVES ON BOTH THE INTELLIGENCEJ SERVES ON BOTH THE INTELLIGENCED SERVES ON BOTH THE INTELLIGENCEC SERVES ON BOTH THE INTELLIGENCEA SERVES ON BOTH THE INTELLIGENCEY COMMITTEES THANK YOU FOR COMING HERE IT LIVE WE APPRECIATED WE'LL ASK ABOUT IMPEACHMENT FIRST

    IS IT A FOREGONE CONCLUSION THAT THE HOUSE WILL VOTE TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT TRUMP? >> YES IT APPEARS THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE BURNED THE LIGHT BULBS BEHIND THEM, THEY'VE MADE THAT SUGGESTION, THEY HAVE NOWHERE TO GO I THINK THEY HAVE TO ANSWER TO THEIR BAYS AND I THINK IT'S A TERRIBLE DECISION FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE YOU CAN SEE WHAT IT'S NOT BASED ON IT IS ENTIRELY POLITICAL

    BUT AS A REPUBLICAN, I HAVE TO TELL YOU, BRET, IT'S GOOD FOR US >> Bret: DO YOU SENSE OR HAVE ANY REASON TO BELIEVE THAT ANY OF YOUR GOP COLLEAGUES WILL VOTE FOR IMPEACHMENT? >> NOPE

    ON THE OTHER HAND, I CAN SAY WITH PRETTY GOOD CERTAINTY THAT THERE WILL BE DEMOCRATS THAT WON'T VOTE TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT >> Bret: DO YOU THINK NANCY PELOSI HAS THE VOTES RIGHT NOW? >> I THINK SHE PROBABLY DOES I THINK SHE WANT TO CALL THE BOARD UNLESS SHE HAS THE VOTES THEY ARE GOING AT BREAK NECK SPEED, THEY ARE LOSING SUPPORT, AND BEFORE THEY LOSE ENOUGH TO GET IT ACROSS THE FINISH LINE, THAT IS WHY THEY WANT TO HAVE THIS VOTE AS EARLY AS NEXT WEEK AFTER ONLY BEING IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE OF JURISDICTION, FOR LESS THAN A WEEK >> Bret: WHAT HAPPENS IF YOUR SITE NOT GET A MINORITY DAY HEARING, WHICH IT DOESN'T LOOK I HEARING, WHICH IT DOESN'T LOOK ' HEARING, WHICH IT DOESN'T LOOK S HEARING, WHICH IT DOESN'T LOOK H HEARING, WHICH IT DOESN'T LOOK P HEARING, WHICH IT DOESN'T LOOK E HEARING, WHICH IT DOESN'T LOOK I HEARING, WHICH IT DOESN'T LOOK G HEARING, WHICH IT DOESN'T LOOK ? >> WE WANT

    IT WILL DEMONSTRATE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE PERVERTED THIS PROCESS HAS BEEN, HOW THEY WANT TO FOLLOW ANY THE PRESIDENT OR STANDARDS PARTICULARLY AS IT RELATES TO FAIRNESS, DURING THE PROCESS >> Bret: THERE WAS MENTION TODAY OF AN INTERVIEW WITH THE INSPECTOR GENERAL A LITTLE — WE ARE TRYING TO FOLLOW IT HERE ONSET >> A LITTLE CRYPTIC

    >> Bret: I HAD TO BE IT IS STILL NOT BEEN RELEASED BY CHAIRMAN SCHIFF IT'S THE FIRST DEPOSITION THAT WAS TAKEN, THE ONLY ONE THAT HASN'T BEEN RELEASED, AND THE REASON IS, IT DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH PROTECTING WHISTLE-BLOWERS IDENTITY, IT HAS TO DO WITH PROTECTING THE WHISTLE-BLOWER AND CHAIRMAN SCHIFF FROM HAVING A CREDIBILITY QUESTION THE WHISTLE-BLOWER DID NOT HAVE TRUTHFUL DISCLOSURES TO THE INSPECTOR GENERAL I QUESTION THE INSPECTOR GENERAL ABOUT THAT

    THE TRANSCRIPT WILL REVEAL THAT IT OUGHT TO BE MADE PUBLIC NO ONE SHOULD BE VOTING TO IMPEACH AMERICAN PRESIDENT BEFORE THEY LOOK AT THE REAL ORIGINS OF THIS THE ORIGINS OF THIS WAS NOT A WHISTLE-BLOWER FILING A COMPLAINT ON AUGUST 12 IT WAS A PERSON WHO LATER BECAME A WHISTLE-BLOWER, WALKING INTO CHAIRMAN SCHIFF'S OFFICE TWO WEEKS BEFORE THAT

    >> Bret: YOU HAVE ZERO HOPE THAT YOU WILL HEAR FROM ADAM SCHIFF OR THERE WAS A BLOWER >> HE WASN'T EVEN AT THE HEARING TODAY HE'S BEEN MAKING ALL THE DECISIONS BEHIND THIS, AND HE WASN'T EVEN AT THE HEARING TODAY >> Bret: LET'S TURN TO THE IG REPORT THIS IS THE SENATE MINORITY LEADER CHUCK SCHUMER

    TAKE A LESSON >> THIS REPORT CONCLUSIVELY DEBUNKS THE BASELESS CONSPIRACY THAT THE INVESTIGATION INTO MR TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND ITS TIES TO RUSSIA ORIGINATED WITH POLITICAL BIAS >> Bret: THAT WAS THE TOP HEADLINE FROM WANT A LOT OF THE DEMOCRATS FOCUSED ON WE DID NOT FIND A DOCUMENTARY OR TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE THAT POLITICAL BIAS OR IMPROPER MOTIVATION INFLUENCE THE FBI'S DECISION TO SEEK FISA AUTHORITYO DECISION TO SEEK FISA AUTHORITYN DECISION TO SEEK FISA AUTHORITYC DECISION TO SEEK FISA AUTHORITYR DECISION TO SEEK FISA AUTHORITYA DECISION TO SEEK FISA AUTHORITYE DECISION TO SEEK FISA AUTHORITY" YOUR RESPONSE TO THE SENATOR AND WHAT YOU TAKE FROM THIS REPORT? >> THERE IS TWO IMPORTANT THINGS THAT WENT ON HERE

    ONE, DID THE FBI MADE TO A VERY LOW THRESHOLD FOR AN ARTICULATE FROM A FACTUAL BASIS TO REASONABLY SUSPECT THERE WAS A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY? THE INSPECTOR GENERAL MADE THE CONCLUSION THAT THEY MET THAT VERY LOW THRESHOLD TO GET THE INVESTIGATION STARTED THE PROBLEM FOR THE FBI, AND FOR DEMOCRATS THAT WANT TO SOMEHOW DECLARE THAT AS OF THE VICTORY, EVERYTHING AFTER THAT IS AN INDICTMENT OF THE PROCESS EVEN IF THERE WAS A BASIS TO OPEN IT, EVERYTHING THAT CAME AFTER IT WAS EXCULPATORY THERE WAS NO REASON TO CONTINUE TO PLAY THE SECOND PART OF THIS THAT IS REALLY IMPORTANT, WHEN THEY GOT TO THE STAGE OF A FISA APPLICATION IN OCTOBER, AS YOU SEE AND HEAR, THIS REPORT IS JUST COMPLETELY FULL OF WHAT THE INSPECTOR GENERAL POLITELY SAYS OUR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS, ANOTHER WAY OF SAYING THAT, LIES, MISREPRESENTATIONS, FALSE STATEMENTS, AND THE FAILURE TO TURN OVER EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE TO INFORMATION >> Bret: IS THAT WHAT STRIKES YOU MOST? >> ABSOLUTELY

    IF THE VALIDATION OF EVERYONE OF US THAT WAS SAYING THERE WAS FISA ABUSE THAT IS WHY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S STATEMENT TODAY WAS, THIS IS CLEAR EVIDENCE OF FISA ABUSE UNFORTUNATELY, WE WERE RIGHT ABOUT THAT THAT IS A REAL PROBLEM FOR THE FBI >> Bret: IT DOESN'T BACK UP THE PRESIDENT, IT'S A CUE TO TAKE THEM DOWN IN THIS REPORT

    >> ACTUALLY, I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU CAN SAY THAT >> Bret: AT LEAST THE IG SAYS THAT >> THE IG IS — HIS ROLE IS TO FIND FACTS, NOT TO NECESSARILY MAKE CONCLUSIONS I AGREE WITH MOST OF THE FACTS THAT THE IG FINES AND THE FACTS AND HEARSAY THAT THE FBI'S SENIOR LEADERSHIP KEPT THE INVESTIGATION GO WHERE THEY KNEW THEY HAD NO EVIDENCE THAT WAS BASED ON A DOSSIER THAT WAS ENTIRELY UNRELIABLE AND THEY KNEW IT AND THEY DID THAT TO CONTINUE AN INVESTIGATION INTO A CANDIDATE THAT THEN BECAME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

    THEY DIDN'T HAVE A BASIS TO DO THAT THAT IS IN THIS REPORT >> Bret: WHAT ABOUT THE CRITICISM OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THAT HE COMES OUT WITH A STATEMENT TODAY, CLEARLY DIFFERING ON SEVERAL POINTS WITH THE IG, AND A SHORT TIME LATER, THE US ATTORNEY, JOHN DURHAM, PUTS OUT A STATEMENT, THAT HE SAYS DOES NOT JIVE WITH THE INSPECTOR GENERAL'S FINDINGS

    PRETTY RARE, IS IT NOT? >> NO, IT'S NOT BECAUSE REALLY, WHAT IT IS IS A SIGN OF RESPECT JOHN DURHAM WAITED UNTIL HOROWITZ'S REPORT CAME OUT THAT IS WHY HE HASN'T MADE PUBLIC STATEMENTS BUT NOW THAT HOROWITZ'S REPORT IS OUT, HE IS FREE TO TALK ABOUT THE FACT THAT WHAT HE HAS FOUND, AT THE FIRST THING THAT HE TOLD YOU WAS, I APPRECIATE THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, BUT MY JURISDICTION IS NOT LIMITED TO HAVE GREATER JURISDICTION AND WHAT I HAVE FOUND IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH HIS CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THAT SEMINAL ISSUE

    THE PREDICATION ISSUE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IN THIS CASE, JOHN DURHAM, IS IT SAYING, I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE PREDICATION HERE I DISAGREE WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THERE WAS NOT PROBABLE CAUSE TO OPEN THIS INVESTIGATIO INVESTIGATION >> Bret: CRITICS WOULD SAY, IF HE IS A PROSECUTOR, DOES HE MAKE HIS CASE, BRING IT TO A GRAND JURY, MAKE A CHART BEFORE MAKING A STATEMENT? REPUBLICANS WERE VERY CRITICAL OF JAMES COMEY >> ABSOLUTELY

    HE DID NOT MAKE A FINDING WITH RESPECT, HE SAID I TAKE ISSUE WITH THE INSPECTOR GENERAL'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS REGARDING PREDICATION ISSUE >> Bret: HE DIDN'T SAY WHAT HIS WAS >> HE DIDN'T SAY WHAT HIS WAS I THINK IT'S A CLEAR SIGN OF WHERE HE IS GOING WITH US, WHICH IS THAT I HAVE GREATER JURISDICTION, I'VE DONE A LOT MORE WITH REGARD TO THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I THINK IN SHORT ORDER, WE WILL HEAR THAT JOHN DURHAM IS GOING TO FIND THAT THE PREDICATION JUST WASN'T THERE, AS MOST OF US REALLY DON'T SEE IT EVEN IN THIS REPORT

    >> Bret: SO WE'VE CHARACTERIZED ON THIS PANEL, TALKING ABOUT THIS, THERE IS TWO TRACKS THERE IS THE IMPEACHMENT TRACT, AND THEN THERE IS THIS JOHN DURHAM TRACK, IG TRACT, AND IS IT YOUR SENSE THERE IS A RACE NOW TO FIGURE OUT WHO IS GOING TO GET TO THE FINISH LINE ON WHAT HAPPENED? >> I'VE SAID THAT ALL ALONG THAT IS WHAT IS DRIVING THIS FAST TRACK THEY WANT TO IMPEACH THIS PRESIDENT SO THAT THE NEWS LIKE THIS COMES OUT, AND THEY SAY, GOSH, WE ARE SORRY THERE WAS FISA ABUSE BUT THE GUY SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED, THAT IS WHY THEY HAVE BEEN RACING THROUGH THIS THIS REPORT, BY ITSELF, THE MORE YOU LOOK AT IT, THE MORE YOU SEE IT'S AN INDICTMENT OF JIM COMEY'S LEADERSHIP AT THE FBI

    THIS IS A PROFOUND STATEMENT ABOUT HOW BAD THINGS WERE THERE WITH REGARD TO AN INVESTIGATION THAT WAS CONTINUED WITHOUT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT IT I THINK FOLKS AT THE FBI ARE HORRIFIED AND DISMAYED BY WHAT IS IN THIS REPORT, AND IS ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE, I THINK, BY WHAT JOHN DURHAM FINES BECAUSE HE HAS THE ABILITY TO GO OUT AND TALK TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY — >> Bret: PEOPLE THAT WEREN'T WORKING IN THE GOVERNMENT LAST THING DEMOCRATS ARE MOVING A PRESCRIPTION BILL THIS WEEK IT LOOKS LIKE, WE ARE HEARING THERE IS MOVEMENT ON USMCA

    DOES THAT UNDERCUT IN ANY WAY THE GOP ARGUMENT THAT DEMOCRATS ARE ULTRA-FOCUSED ON IMPEACHMENT, AND CAN'T GET ANYTHING ELSE DONE? >> IT'S BEEN THEIR PLAN ALL ALONG NANCY PELOSI, IT'S THE WORST KEPT SECRET, THAT ONCE THEY VOTED ON IMPEACHMENT, MOVE THAT OFF, THEY WOULD SHIFT TO DO, WE ARE READY TO GET TO WORK

    WE ARE MOVING FORWARD ON USMCA COMFORT SCRIPTION DRUGS, ALL THE THINGS WE HAVE BEEN CRITICIZING

    Source: Youtube

    This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar

    %d bloggers like this: