Rep. Raskin On Next Steps In Trump Impeachment Inquiry | All In | MSNBC

FACTS THAT HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED HAS MET THAT STANDARD HAS MET THAT STANDARD

>> FORMER LAW PROFESSOR, WHO HAS >> FORMER LAW PROFESSOR, WHO HAS BEEN PROVIDING GUIDANCE ON HOW BEEN PROVIDING GUIDANCE ON HOW TO NAVIGATE THIS AND HE JOINS ME TO NAVIGATE THIS AND HE JOINS ME NOW NOW >> WHAT DO YOU SEE? >> WHAT DO YOU SEE? >> THERE WERE COMPLAINTS FROM >> THERE WERE COMPLAINTS FROM REPUBLICANS REPUBLICANS AND THERE WAS A GHOST OF A AND THERE WAS A GHOST OF A POINT

POINT THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE DOING THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE DOING THE FACT-FINDING PART OF THIS THE FACT-FINDING PART OF THIS WAS A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN HOW WAS A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN HOW IT HAS BEEN HANDLED IN THE PAST IT HAS BEEN HANDLED IN THE PAST GIVEN THAT IT IS BEING PASSED GIVEN THAT IT IS BEING PASSED FROM INTEL TO THE JUDICIARY FROM INTEL TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, WHAT DO YOU VIEW AS COMMITTEE, WHAT DO YOU VIEW AS YOUR COMMITTEE’S RULE? YOUR COMMITTEE’S RULE? >> WE’RE GOING TO LOOK AT WHAT >> WE’RE GOING TO LOOK AT WHAT THE FOUNDER’S MEN BY HAVING THE FOUNDER’S MEN BY HAVING IMPEACHMENT IN THE CONSTITUTION IMPEACHMENT IN THE CONSTITUTION

WE KNOW THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE WE KNOW THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE MEETS EVERY FOUR YEARS MEETS EVERY FOUR YEARS WHY DID THEY DECIDE TO HAVE WHY DID THEY DECIDE TO HAVE IMPEACHMENT IN THERE? IMPEACHMENT IN THERE? THEY WANTED THE PEOPLE TO HAVE A THEY WANTED THE PEOPLE TO HAVE A LAST INSTRUMENT OF LAST INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL SELF-DEFENSE CONSTITUTIONAL SELF-DEFENSE AGAINST A PRESIDENT WHO ACTS AGAINST A PRESIDENT WHO ACTS LIKE A KING AND TRAMPLES THE LIKE A KING AND TRAMPLES THE TRULY OF LAW TRULY OF LAW IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING RID OF IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING RID OF THE KINGS

THE KINGS IT WAS ALL KINGS AND QUEENS AND IT WAS ALL KINGS AND QUEENS AND ELECTION AND TREACHERY AND WAR ELECTION AND TREACHERY AND WAR BY THE KINGDOMS FOR POWER BY THE KINGDOMS FOR POWER THEY WANTED TO CREATE ON A THEY WANTED TO CREATE ON A DIFFERENT PRINCIPLE DIFFERENT PRINCIPLE

IT WAS THE KING IS THAT THE IT WAS THE KING IS THAT THE QUEEN AND THE CLERKY AND ON THE QUEEN AND THE CLERKY AND ON THE BOTTOM WAS THE PEOPLE BOTTOM WAS THE PEOPLE AND OUR FOUNDERS FILMED IT AND OUR FOUNDERS FILMED IT UPSIDE DOWN AND SAID WE THE UPSIDE DOWN AND SAID WE THE PEOPLE PEOPLE WE STARTED THAT IT WAY

WE STARTED THAT IT WAY THE FRAMERS PUT IN EVERY THE FRAMERS PUT IN EVERY CONCEIVABLE SAFEGUARD TO MAKE CONCEIVABLE SAFEGUARD TO MAKE SURE THE PRESIDENT WOULD NOT SURE THE PRESIDENT WOULD NOT BECOME LIKE A KING BECOME LIKE A KING >> YOU’RE USING THIS FRAMEWORK >> YOU’RE USING THIS FRAMEWORK

WHAT ABOUT WHEN SOMEONE SAYS, I WHAT ABOUT WHEN SOMEONE SAYS, I DON’T CARE WHAT THE FOUNDERS DON’T CARE WHAT THE FOUNDERS THOUGHT THOUGHT WHY DOES IT MATTER TO ME? WHY DOES IT MATTER TO ME? WHY SHOULD I CARE IN I’M A NURSE WHY SHOULD I CARE IN I’M A NURSE OR A REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONAL OR A REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONAL AND I DON’T LIKE DONALD TRUMP AND I DON’T LIKE DONALD TRUMP WHAT IS THE BITE OF WHAT HE HAS WHAT IS THE BITE OF WHAT HE HAS DONE IN THE LIFE OF THE DONE IN THE LIFE OF THE REPUBLICAN? REPUBLICAN? >> THE WHOLE POINT IS BITS THE >> THE WHOLE POINT IS BITS THE COMMON PEOPLE

COMMON PEOPLE IT IS ABOUT THE COMMON PEOPLE IT IS ABOUT THE COMMON PEOPLE NOT A MONEY MAKING OPERATION FOR NOT A MONEY MAKING OPERATION FOR ONE GUY AND HIS ROYAL FAMILY ONE GUY AND HIS ROYAL FAMILY

IT IS NOT TO EXPAND THE BUSINESS IT IS NOT TO EXPAND THE BUSINESS EMPIRE AND TO WORK WITH TYRANTS EMPIRE AND TO WORK WITH TYRANTS AND DESPOTS AROUND THE WORLD AND DESPOTS AROUND THE WORLD IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE FOR THE IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE FOR THE COMMON GOOD COMMON GOOD IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE TO ADVANCE IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE TO ADVANCE THE COMMON GOOD

THE COMMON GOOD TO PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON TO PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE DEFENSE THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY

THAT’S THE PREAMBLE OF OUR THAT’S THE PREAMBLE OF OUR CONSTITUTION AND IT FLOWS INTO CONSTITUTION AND IT FLOWS INTO ARTICLE ONE WHICH SAYS THE ARTICLE ONE WHICH SAYS THE LEGISLATIVE POWER IS VESTED IN LEGISLATIVE POWER IS VESTED IN CONGRESS CONGRESS IT IS UP TO CONGRESS TO BE THE IT IS UP TO CONGRESS TO BE THE PEOPLE PEOPLE COMMERCE, WAR, COPY RIGHT

COMMERCE, WAR, COPY RIGHT AND THEN YOU GET ON ARTICLE TWO AND THEN YOU GET ON ARTICLE TWO AND IT IS FOUR SHORT SECTIONS AND IT IS FOUR SHORT SECTIONS ONE IS ABOUT IMPEACHING THE ONE IS ABOUT IMPEACHING THE PRESIDENT WHO FORGETS WHAT HIS PRESIDENT WHO FORGETS WHAT HIS JOB IS JOB IS

WHAT IS HIS REAL JOB? WHAT IS HIS REAL JOB? TO TAKE CARE THAT THE LAW IS TO TAKE CARE THAT THE LAW IS FAITHFULLY EXECUTED FAITHFULLY EXECUTED >> YOU JUST OUTLINED A BROAD >> YOU JUST OUTLINED A BROAD CASE CASE IN THE ABSTRACT THEORETICAL IN THE ABSTRACT THEORETICAL TERMS

TERMS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PRESIDENCY IS A PUBLIC TRUST FOR PRESIDENCY IS A PUBLIC TRUST FOR THE GENERAL WELFARE THE GENERAL WELFARE THE JOINT CONSTITUTIONAL THE JOINT CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPTION CONCEPTION CONCEPTION CONCEPTION

VERSUS USING IT AS A PRIVATE GET VERSUS USING IT AS A PRIVATE GET RICH QUICK OPERATION RICH QUICK OPERATION OR A PRIVATE MEANS OF MACHINE OR A PRIVATE MEANS OF MACHINE POWER THAT WE’VE SEEN POWER THAT WE’VE SEEN LIKE CORRUPT WARD BOSSES

LIKE CORRUPT WARD BOSSES >> YES >> YES >> IS THAT THE CASE THAT YOU >> IS THAT THE CASE THAT YOU ANTICIPATE MAKING? ANTICIPATE MAKING? THAT’S BROADER THAN WHAT I THAT’S BROADER THAN WHAT I UNDERSTAND IS COMING DOWN THE UNDERSTAND IS COMING DOWN THE PIPE FROM INTEL ABOUT UKRAINE PIPE FROM INTEL ABOUT UKRAINE

>> THE FRAMERS OF THE >> THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION CONSTITUTION WHAT WE HAVE IN MIND WHAT WE HAVE IN MIND WE HAVE TO RECOVER THIS

WE HAVE TO RECOVER THIS WE NEED A NATIONAL CIVICS LESSON WE NEED A NATIONAL CIVICS LESSON INTO WHAT OUR CONSTITUTION IS INTO WHAT OUR CONSTITUTION IS ABOUT ABOUT THE CONGRESS WAS CHARGED WITH THE CONGRESS WAS CHARGED WITH THE POWER OF PROMOTING THE THE POWER OF PROMOTING THE GENERAL WELFARE GENERAL WELFARE

IT IS CONGRESS THAT PASSES THE IT IS CONGRESS THAT PASSES THE LAWS LAWS THE PRESIDENT’S JOB TO TAKE CARE THE PRESIDENT’S JOB TO TAKE CARE THAT IT IS GENERALLY EXECUTED THAT IT IS GENERALLY EXECUTED WHY DO WE HAVE THE POWER TO WHY DO WE HAVE THE POWER TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT AND HE IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT AND HE DOESN’T HAVE THE POWER TO DOESN’T HAVE THE POWER TO IMPEACH US? IMPEACH US? THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION WANTED TO PUT THE PEOPLE AND WANTED TO PUT THE PEOPLE AND THEIR REPRESENTATIVES IN CHARGE

THEIR REPRESENTATIVES IN CHARGE WHAT WE’RE ABOUT TO EMBARK ON IS WHAT WE’RE ABOUT TO EMBARK ON IS NOT ABOUT CRIME AND PUNISHMENT NOT ABOUT CRIME AND PUNISHMENT DONALD TRUMP WOULD NOT TO GO DONALD TRUMP WOULD NOT TO GO JAIL FOR ONE DAY UNDER JAIL FOR ONE DAY UNDER IMPEACHMENT IMPEACHMENT

IT IS MAKING SURE THAT THE IT IS MAKING SURE THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS WORKING FOR THE GOVERNMENT IS WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE AND NOT FOR THE PRIVATE PEOPLE AND NOT FOR THE PRIVATE INTERESTS OF THE PRESIDENT INTERESTS OF THE PRESIDENT HERE OR ANYWHERE ELSE HERE OR ANYWHERE ELSE >> HERE’S MY DIAGNOSIS OF THE >> HERE’S MY DIAGNOSIS OF THE WAY THE CAUCUS HAS RESPONDED TO WAY THE CAUCUS HAS RESPONDED TO NEW FACTS

NEW FACTS THE FOLLOWING THE FOLLOWING I WANT TO HEAR YOUR RESPONSE I WANT TO HEAR YOUR RESPONSE

THEY THOUGHT THE MUELLER REPORT THEY THOUGHT THE MUELLER REPORT WAS VERY BAD WAS VERY BAD THEY THOUGHT THEY HAD SHOWED THEY THOUGHT THEY HAD SHOWED THAT THE PRESIDENT DID OBSTRUCT THAT THE PRESIDENT DID OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND THAT’S AN JUSTICE AND THAT’S AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE BUST THEY IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE BUST THEY WERE WARY THAT IT WAS A WERE WARY THAT IT WAS A DIFFICULT CASE TO MAKE TO THE DIFFICULT CASE TO MAKE TO THE PUBLIC AND THAT THERE IS A PUBLIC AND THAT THERE IS A POLITICAL WILL THAT HAS TO POLITICAL WILL THAT HAS TO HAPPEN HAPPEN AND THE MOMENT FOR THE MEMBERS AND THE MOMENT FOR THE MEMBERS OF THE CAUCUS WAS SEEING HIM USE OF THE CAUCUS WAS SEEING HIM USE HIS POWERS TO ATTEMPT TO RIG THE HIS POWERS TO ATTEMPT TO RIG THE NEXT ELECTION

NEXT ELECTION HOW MUCH DOES THAT FEATURE IN HOW MUCH DOES THAT FEATURE IN ABOUT WHY IT CROSSES? ABOUT WHY IT CROSSES? >> I THINK YOU’RE RIGHT ABOUT >> I THINK YOU’RE RIGHT ABOUT THE MUELLER REPORT THE MUELLER REPORT IT WAS ABOUT WHAT THAT IN 2016 IT WAS ABOUT WHAT THAT IN 2016 IN THAT ELECTION IN THAT ELECTION

AND REMEMBER, THE ATTORNEY AND REMEMBER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR ESSENTIALLY GENERAL BARR ESSENTIALLY KIDNAPPED THE REPORT FOR THREE KIDNAPPED THE REPORT FOR THREE AND A HALF WEEKS, MISSTATED THE AND A HALF WEEKS, MISSTATED THE CONTENTS, PROMPTING TO WRITE NOT CONTENTS, PROMPTING TO WRITE NOT ONE BUT TWO LETTERS OF PROTEST ONE BUT TWO LETTERS OF PROTEST ABOUT CONFUSION OF THE PUBLIC ABOUT CONFUSION OF THE PUBLIC BUT THIS WAS VERY DIFFERENT WITH BUT THIS WAS VERY DIFFERENT WITH THE UKRAINE SHAKEDOWN THE UKRAINE SHAKEDOWN IT WAS HAPPENING IN REAL-TIME

IT WAS HAPPENING IN REAL-TIME THE PRESIDENT WASN’T DELEGATING THE PRESIDENT WASN’T DELEGATING TO IT ERIC TRUMP AND DONALD TO IT ERIC TRUMP AND DONALD TRUMP JR TRUMP JR HE WAS DOING IT HIMSELF HE WAS DOING IT HIMSELF

HE WAS THE ONE ON THAT JULY 25th HE WAS THE ONE ON THAT JULY 25th PHONE CALL PHONE CALL HE WAS THE ONE WHO SENT RUDY HE WAS THE ONE WHO SENT RUDY GIULIANI AND HIS TEAM OF GIULIANI AND HIS TEAM OF OPERATIVES TO SHAKE DOWN THE OPERATIVES TO SHAKE DOWN THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT SO ALL OF THIS HAPPENED IN SO ALL OF THIS HAPPENED IN REAL-TIME

REAL-TIME ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR WAS NOT ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR WAS NOT ABLE TO COVER IT UP ABLE TO COVER IT UP SO THIS IS THE MOST VIVID SO THIS IS THE MOST VIVID DEMONSTRATION OF HOW THEY’RE DEMONSTRATION OF HOW THEY’RE DOING BUSINESS IN THE TRUMP DOING BUSINESS IN THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE WHITE HOUSE

>> THAT’S THE QUESTION THAT >> THAT’S THE QUESTION THAT HAUNTS ME PERSONALLY HAUNTS ME PERSONALLY IS THIS THE ONLY TIME THEY DID IS THIS THE ONLY TIME THEY DID IT? IT? >> IF IT ISN’T, I WOULD LIKE TO >> IF IT ISN’T, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE FACTS ABOUT WHAT THE HAVE THE FACTS ABOUT WHAT THE BACK CHANNEL OF TURKEY IS LIKE BACK CHANNEL OF TURKEY IS LIKE AND SAUDI ARABIA IS LIKE AND A AND SAUDI ARABIA IS LIKE AND A VARIETY OF OTHER FOREIGN POLICY VARIETY OF OTHER FOREIGN POLICY MOVES MOVES THE PRESIDENT HAS MADE THROUGH THE PRESIDENT HAS MADE THROUGH THE BACK CHANNELS

THE BACK CHANNELS THEY’VE BEEN INCREDIBLY FRIENDLY THEY’VE BEEN INCREDIBLY FRIENDLY TO STATES THAT HAVE LEFT PEOPLE TO STATES THAT HAVE LEFT PEOPLE SCRATCHING THEIR HEADS SCRATCHING THEIR HEADS JOHN BOLTON TOLD A PRIVATE GROUP JOHN BOLTON TOLD A PRIVATE GROUP OF PEOPLE, HE THINKS FINANCIAL OF PEOPLE, HE THINKS FINANCIAL INTERESTS ARE DRIVING IT INTERESTS ARE DRIVING IT

THAT’S JOHN BOLTON THAT’S JOHN BOLTON THAT’S WHAT HE SAID IN A PRIVATE THAT’S WHAT HE SAID IN A PRIVATE DINNER DINNER >> AND THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE IS >> AND THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE IS CENTRAL TO UNDERSTANDING THE CENTRAL TO UNDERSTANDING THE FRAMERS’ CONCEPTION OF OUR FRAMERS’ CONCEPTION OF OUR CONSTITUTION

CONSTITUTION IT IS NOT THE PRESIDENT’S JOCK IT IS NOT THE PRESIDENT’S JOCK RUNNING OFF SELL HIS INFLUENCE RUNNING OFF SELL HIS INFLUENCE TO FOREIGN POWERS TO GET HIMSELF TO FOREIGN POWERS TO GET HIMSELF RICH RICH NOR IS IT THE PRESIDENT’S JOB TO NOR IS IT THE PRESIDENT’S JOB TO CHANNEL THE CHANNEL THE

AT A PAIRS’ MONEY AT A PAIRS’ MONEY >> THAT’S A LEGAL RESPONSE >> THAT’S A LEGAL RESPONSE I DONE FEEL LIKE I KNOW FULLY AS I DONE FEEL LIKE I KNOW FULLY AS A U

S CITIZEN AND A JOURNALIST A US CITIZEN AND A JOURNALIST WHO COVERS THIS WHO COVERS THIS

>> I SHARED YOUR PASSION FOR >> I SHARED YOUR PASSION FOR FINDING OUT THE ANSWERS TO EVERY FINDING OUT THE ANSWERS TO EVERY ONE OF THOSE PARTICULAR LEADS ONE OF THOSE PARTICULAR LEADS IT IS ABOUT COULD NOT OUR IT IS ABOUT COULD NOT OUR OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITY OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITY ON THE OTHER HAND, DONALD TRUMP, ON THE OTHER HAND, DONALD TRUMP, NOT HERE IN THE CONTEXT OF NOT HERE IN THE CONTEXT OF IMPEACHMENT BUT AS A POLITICAL IMPEACHMENT BUT AS A POLITICAL OBSERVER WHO HAS WATCHED FOR OBSERVER WHO HAS WATCHED FOR SEVERAL YEARS IN CONGRESS

SEVERAL YEARS IN CONGRESS AS HE ONE-MAN CRIME WAVE AS HE ONE-MAN CRIME WAVE HE HAS MORE THAN 3,000 LAWSUITS HE HAS MORE THAN 3,000 LAWSUITS THAT HE’S EMBROILED IN THAT HE’S EMBROILED IN

WHEN HE WAS IN PRIVATE BUSINESS, WHEN HE WAS IN PRIVATE BUSINESS, HE DID NOT FAYE CONTRACTORS AND HE DID NOT FAYE CONTRACTORS AND HE DIDN’T PAY THE PLUMBERS AND HE DIDN’T PAY THE PLUMBERS AND HE DIDN’T PAY THE CARPENTERS HE DIDN’T PAY THE CARPENTERS HE DIDN’T PAY ANYBODY AND HE DIDN’T PAY ANYBODY AND THERE’S LOTS OF LITIGATION THERE’S LOTS OF LITIGATION THERE THERE WITH UNIONS AND ON AND ON

WITH UNIONS AND ON AND ON WE CAN’T DO ALL OF THAT HERE WE CAN’T DO ALL OF THAT HERE WE WON’T BE ABLE TO DO THAT WE WON’T BE ABLE TO DO THAT HERE HERE

BUT WE CAN DO IS DETERMINE BUT WE CAN DO IS DETERMINE WHETHER THERE WERE HIGH CRIMES WHETHER THERE WERE HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS AND MISDEMEANORS THE CONSTITUTION TALKS ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION TALKS ABOUT TREASON, BRIBERY, OTHER HIGH TREASON, BRIBERY, OTHER HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS THEY’RE BETRAILS OF THE THEY’RE BETRAILS OF THE ESSENTIAL DUTIES OF THE OFFICE

ESSENTIAL DUTIES OF THE OFFICE TREASON BETRAYS NATIONAL TREASON BETRAYS NATIONAL SECURITY SECURITY BRIBERY BETRAYS THE PUBLIC BRIBERY BETRAYS THE PUBLIC INTEREST INTEREST

THE OTHER HIGH CRIMES AND THE OTHER HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS ARE SUBSTITUTING MISDEMEANORS ARE SUBSTITUTING YOUR PRIVATE INTERESTS AND YOUR PRIVATE INTERESTS AND AMBITIONS FOR THE NATIONAL AMBITIONS FOR THE NATIONAL INTERESTS INTERESTS FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND I THINK THE UKRAINE ELSE AND I THINK THE UKRAINE ELSE CAPTURES ALL OF THEM

CAPTURES ALL OF THEM IT ALSO LEADS INTO OTHER ABUSES IT ALSO LEADS INTO OTHER ABUSES OF POWER OF POWER THE SORTS OF OBSTRUCTION OF THE SORTS OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE THAT WE’VE SEEN FROM THE JUSTICE THAT WE’VE SEEN FROM THE VERY BEGINNING VERY BEGINNING

THE PRESIDENT HAS TRIED TO THE PRESIDENT HAS TRIED TO BLOCKADE WITNESSES BLOCKADE WITNESSES HE’S TRIED TO WITHHOLD EVIDENCE HE’S TRIED TO WITHHOLD EVIDENCE HE’S TRIED TO FRUSTRATE OUR HE’S TRIED TO FRUSTRATE OUR INVESTIGATION AT EVERY TURN

INVESTIGATION AT EVERY TURN AND EVERYBODY SHOULD BE AND EVERYBODY SHOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT THAT CONCERNED ABOUT THAT WHATEVER YOU THINK ABOUT THE WHATEVER YOU THINK ABOUT THE SHAKEDOWN ITSELF, WHETHER YOU SHAKEDOWN ITSELF, WHETHER YOU THINK IT WAS BRIBERY, EXTORTION THINK IT WAS BRIBERY, EXTORTION OR SOMETHING ELSE OR SOMETHING ELSE

WHATEVER YOU THINK, EVERYBODY WHATEVER YOU THINK, EVERYBODY SHOULD BE OPPOSED TO THE SHOULD BE OPPOSED TO THE PRESIDENT BEING ABLE TO PRESIDENT BEING ABLE TO OBSTRUCT OBSTRUCT WHAT IT MEANS IS WE HAVE A WHAT IT MEANS IS WE HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO CAN OPERATE WITH PRESIDENT WHO CAN OPERATE WITH IMPUGNITY AND IMMUNITY IMPUGNITY AND IMMUNITY HE IS ABLE TO COVER UP HIS HE IS ABLE TO COVER UP HIS CRIMES

CRIMES THAT’S A VERY DANGEROUS THAT’S A VERY DANGEROUS PRECEDENT TO SET

Source: Youtube