BuzzyBuzz

    Everything you want to know just here you will find

    Rep. Jordan sounds off on Democrats' treatment of AG Barr at House hearing

    /
    /
    /
    8 Views

    >> FOR MONTHS YOU HAVE TRIED TO >> FOR MONTHS YOU HAVE TRIED TO GET THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO COME HE IS HERE WHY DON’T YOU LET HIM SPEAK AND ANSWER THE QUESTION

    TIME AFTER TIME [GAVEL] >> IF YOU WANT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO COME AT LEAST LET HIM ANSWER THE QUESTIONS AND THE ACCUSATIONS MADE AGAINST HIM >> THE GENTLEMAN’S RUDENESS IS NOT RECOGNIZED >> RUDENESS IS ON THE OTHER SIDE TIME AFTER TIME YOU REFUSED TO LET THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES ANSWER THE QUESTIONS POSED TO HIM

    STEVE: YOUR RUDENESS IS NOT RECOGNIZED UNBELIEVABLE BRING IN THE GUY SCREEN RIGHT JIM JORDAN REPUBLICAN FROM OHIO HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE RANKING MEMBER JIM, GOOD MORNING TO YOU

    >> GOOD MORNING, STEVE STEVE: CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME, AINSLEY, AND BRIAN WHY THE DEMOCRATS THOUGHT THEY WOULD LOOK TERRIFIC IF THEY WOULD ASK BILL BARR A QUESTION AND THEN FOUR SECONDS LATER CUT HIM OFF? >> THERE IS NO EXPLANATION AS I SAID IN THE HEARING YESTERDAY, YOU HAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HERE LET THE GUY TALK BUT THEY WOULDN’T LET US COMPLETE OUR VIDEO

    THEY WOULDN’T LET HIM ANSWER QUESTIONS STEVE: THEY PULLED THE PLUG ON THE VIDEO >> IT WASN’T ALL THE WAY THROUGH WE HAD MORE TO SHOW THEY WOULDN’T LET HIM ANSWER THE QUESTIONS

    AND THERE WAS A POINT WHERE THEY WEREN’T GOING TO LET HIM TAKE A RESTROOM BREAK THAT’S HOW RUDE THEY WERE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN OUT TO GET THIS GUY, AS I SAID IN MY OPENING STATEMENT, EVER SINCE HE USED THE WORD SPYING AND CALLED IT WHAT IT WAS THEY HAVE BEEN SO MUCH OUT TO GET HIM THEY FILED ALLERGIES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM THREE WEEKS AGO BRIAN: PEOPLE ON CHANNELS PEACEFUL PROTESTS ARE UPSET THAT YOU TOOK THEM OUT OF CONTEXT IF PEOPLE DIDN’T SEE THE VIDEO IF YOU GUYS WERE BUSY DURING THE DAY YESTERDAY YOU OPENED UP TO SAY THESE ARE NOT PEACEFUL PROTESTS

    I WILL SHOW YOU THE DIFFERENCE YOU TALKED ABOUT THE DONE FAMILY AND WE SAW THEM TALK ABOUT THE DEATH OF THE DAD IN THAT FAMILY, THE HUSBAND IN THAT FAMILY AT THE SAME TIME WE SAW EVERYTHING BURNING WHAT’S YOUR ANSWER TO THOSE ON OTHER CHANNELS THAT SAID YOU TOOK THEM OUT OF CONTEXT? >> WELL, HOW CAN YOU TAKE THEM OUT OF CONTEXT? THEY ARE STANDING OUT OF THE CAMERA SAYING IT’S A PEACEFUL PROTEST STEVE: A FIRE

    >> FIRE BURNING MAYBE IT’S A PEACEFUL FIRE RIDICULOUS FOR THEM TO SAY THAT THAT’S WHY WE SHOWED IT THEY KEEP SAYING PEACEFUL PROTEST

    AS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SAID WHY WON’T THEY CONDEMN THE MOB WHY WON’T THE MAINSTREAM PRESS WHY WON’T DEMOCRATS CONDEMN THE MOB? WHY WON’T THEY SPEAK OUT AGAINST THIS CRAZY DEFUND THE POLICE POLICY THAT’S CAUSING THE HARM OF THREE OFFICERS WENT BLIND — WERE BLINDED THIS PAST WEEKEND BECAUSE OF THE MOB IN PORTLAND SO, THAT’S WHAT WE’RE CONCERNED ABOUT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS DOING A GREAT JOB AS ATTORNEY GENERAL

    IS HE DOING A GREAT JOB TRYING TO PROTECT FEDERAL PROPERTY AND ENFORCE FEDERAL LAW WHY WON’T THE DEMOCRATS HELP? WHY WON’T THEY SPEAK OUT AGAINST IT AND TALK ABOUT HOW CRAZY IT IS TO DEFUND THE POLICE? AINSLEY: SO NANCY PELOSI, SHE HAD THIS TO SAY LISTEN HE WAS LIKE A BLOB HE WAS JUST A HENCHMAN FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES INSTEAD OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    AINSLEY: SHE IS SAYING IS HE A HENCHMAN AND HE SAID YESTERDAY, BARR SAID YESTERDAY THAT THE PRESIDENT EXPECTS ME TO EXERCISE MY INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT TO MAKE CALLS THE WAY — TO MAKE CALLS I THINK ARE RIGHT AND THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT I HAVE DONE HE SAID THAT HE INSISTS THAT HE ACTS INDEPENDENT OF THE PRESIDENT NANCY PELOSI IS SAYING IS HE A HENCHMAN AND A BLOB THERE IS A DOUBLE STANDARD THERE WHAT IF SOMEONE CALLED A WOMAN A BLOB? WHAT’S YOUR RESPONSE? >> NO

    IT’S TERRIBLE BUT THIS IS THE SAME INDIVIDUAL WHO SAID THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS AN IMPOSTURE BACK DURING IMPEACHMENT THE GUY WHO IS 63 MILLION AMERICANS VOTED FOR SHE CALLED AN IMPOSTURE I DON’T TAKE WHAT SHE SAYS ABOUT PEOPLE IN THE ADMINISTRATION VERY SERIOUSLY BILL BARR AS I SAID EARLIER IS DOING A GOOD JOB

    HE IS COMMITTED TO THE RULE OF LAW HE SAID SOMETHING ELSE, YESTERDAY, THAT’S SO IMPORTANT HE SAID HE IS TIRED OF THE DOUBLE STANDARD THE ONE SET OF RULES FOR THE POLITICAL ELITE IF YOUR NAME IS COMEY, CLAPPER, BRENNAN, YOU GET ONE SET OF RULES AND US REGULAR FOLKS GET ANOTHER SET

    THAT’S WHY DURHAM IS DOING AN INVESTIGATION TO FIND OUT WHAT HAPPENED I THOUGHT THAT WAS ANOTHER GREAT LINE SO CONSISTENT WITH ADMINISTERING THE RULE OF LAW AND HAVING EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW STEVE: LET’S SWITCH GEARS JUST A MOMENT BIG TECH ALTHOUGH NOT TWITTER GOING UP ON CAPITOL HILL TODAY TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT HOW SOME IN CONGRESS FEEL THEY ARE CENSORING POINTS OF VIEWPOINT DONALD DONALD TRUMP JR TWITTER WAS SUSPENDED 12 HOURS YESTERDAY AFTER HE SHARED A VIDEO ABOUT HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE HERE IS HE TALKING ABOUT THIS >> IF THEY ARE CENSORING MY ACCOUNT THEY ARE CENSORING OTHERS

    WHEN I POSTED THAT VIDEO I DIDN’T SAY THIS IS THE GOSPEL YOU I SAID WOW, THIS A MUST WATCH SEEMS VERY CONTRARY TO THE NARRATIVE THAT THEY HAVE BEEN FORCE FEEDING US FOR A LITTLE WHILE TWITTER TAKES ME DOWN FOR THAT BUT TWITTER HAS NO PROBLEM SAYING THAT CORONAVIRUS DISINFORMATION SPREAD BY THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT VIOLATE THEIR RULINGS I JUST PUT SOMETHING OUT THERE THAT CHALLENGED THE NARRATIVE

    BECAUSE I HAVE A LARGE PLATFORM, I’M CANCELED STEVE: AND JUST LIKE YOU SAID A MOMENT AGO ON THE OTHER TOPIC THERE IS A DOUBLE STANDARD >> THERE IS DEFINITELY A DOUBLE STANDARD THEY CENSOR CONSERVATIVES BIG TECH CENSOR CONSERVATIVES

    IT’S NOT THAT WE THINK THAT’S THE CASE THAT IS THE FACT THOSE ARECASE THOSE ARE THE FACTS TWITTER ALLOWED A TWEET FROM IRAN IN THE TWEET HE TALKS ABOUT STRIKING A BLOW AGAINST THE UNITED STATES

    THEY ALLOW THAT BUT CENSOR DON JR AND CENSOR THE PRESIDENT? THIS IS CRAZY THEY ARE GOING TO HEAR ABOUT THAT TODAY IN THE HEARING ABOUT THIS DOUBLE STANDARD I POINT OUT THERE WERE FOUR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS SHADOW BANNED JUST TWO YEARS AGO YOU THINK ABOUT 435 IN THE HOUSE AND 100 IN THE STATE

    ONLY FOUR GATES, NUNES, MEADOWS AND JORDAN THEY SAID IT WAS JUST A GLITCH WHAT DID YOU PUT IN THE ALGORITHM? IT’S NOT A GLITCH IF I HAD A NICKEL FOR EVERY TIME THEY SAID THE WORD DITCH — BRIAN: THIS IS NOT INTERESTING, FASCINATING OR AGGRAVATING THIS IS GOING TO AFFECT THE ELECTION

    JEFF BEZOS, JOE COOK AND FOR BEZOS THE FIRST TIME THIS IS GOING TO BE EXTRAORDINARY FOR GOOGLE THEY ARE SUPPRESSING CONSERVATIVE WRITERS YOU HAD BREITBART ON SAYING THEY GAVE THIS WARNING A YEAR AGO THE AVERAGE AMERICAN NOT INTO POLITICS LIKE THIS IS GOING TO BE SEARCHING DIFFERENT ARTICLES TO GET PERSPECTIVES

    WONDERING WHY YOU CANNOT GET CONSERVATIVE POINTS OF VIEW RIGHT OR WRONG THAT I KNOW, IS WRONG >> YEAH YOU ARE RIGHT, BRIAN PARTICULARLY IN AN ELECTION YEAR

    WE HAVE A FILIBUSTER OF EXAMPLES THAT WE’LL POINTS OUT TODAY IN THE HEARING THAT HAVE HAPPENED IN JUST THE PAST FEW MONTHS HERE WE ARE 97 DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION THE IMPACT IT COULD HAVE ON THE ELECTION PROCESS IS PROFOUND SO, THAT IS WHY THIS IS SO IMPORTANT THAT WE BRIAN: YOU GOT TO SCORE POINTS TODAY

    YOU CAN’T TALK AT EACH OTHER YOU HAVE GOT TO SCORE POINTS TODAY >> I THINK WE HAVE GOT TO SHOW WHAT’S GOING ON AND HOW THAT COULD IMPACT THE ELECTION I THINK THAT’S CRITICAL AINSLEY: CONGRESSMAN, THANKS FOR BEING WITH US

    >> YOU BET THANK YOU ALL

    Source: Youtube

    This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar

    %d bloggers like this: