Panic Over Sanders Unsupported By Data | All In | MSNBC

>>> YOU NOTICE THERE’S A BIT OF >>> YOU NOTICE THERE’S A BIT OF A FREAK OUT AMONG CERTAIN A FREAK OUT AMONG CERTAIN SEGMENTS OF DEMOCRATS AND SEGMENTS OF DEMOCRATS AND MEMBERS OF THE MEDIA ABOUT MEMBERS OF THE MEDIA ABOUT BERNIE SANDERS’S STRONG POSITION BERNIE SANDERS’S STRONG POSITION IN THE DEMOCRATIC FIELD IN THE DEMOCRATIC FIELD

THERE ARE TWO ASPECTS TO THE THERE ARE TWO ASPECTS TO THE FREAK OUT FREAK OUT ONE SUBSTANTIVE TO PEOPLE WHO ONE SUBSTANTIVE TO PEOPLE WHO DON’T LIKE HIS POLITICS AND DON’T LIKE HIS POLITICS AND POLICIES POLICIES HE HE THEY THINK HE WOULD BE A BAD THEY THINK HE WOULD BE A BAD PRESIDENT

PRESIDENT THAT’S FINE THAT’S FINE WHICHEVER PLATFORM BEST SUPPORTS WHICHEVER PLATFORM BEST SUPPORTS AMERICA IS THE ONE FOR THE AMERICA IS THE ONE FOR THE PRIMARY PRIMARY

THE ONE I SEE MORE OFTEN IS THE ONE I SEE MORE OFTEN IS SANDERS IS SURE TO BE AN SANDERS IS SURE TO BE AN ELECTORAL DISASTER ELECTORAL DISASTER I AM HERE TO TELL YOU THE I AM HERE TO TELL YOU THE EVIDENCE WE HAVE TO THE EXTENT EVIDENCE WE HAVE TO THE EXTENT OF EVIDENCE ABOUT AN UNKNOWABLE OF EVIDENCE ABOUT AN UNKNOWABLE FUTURE JUST DOES NOT SUPPORT FUTURE JUST DOES NOT SUPPORT THAT AT ALL THAT AT ALL I MEAN, I SPENT ALL DAY LOOKING I MEAN, I SPENT ALL DAY LOOKING AT THIS STUFF

AT THIS STUFF I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW THE FUTURE I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW THE FUTURE AS WE ALL WOULD AS WE ALL WOULD WE CAN’T KNOW THE FUTURE WE CAN’T KNOW THE FUTURE

ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS LOOK IN THE ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS LOOK IN THE EVIDENCE WE HAVE EVIDENCE WE HAVE IT’S NOT IN THE DATA IT’S NOT IN THE DATA IT JUST ISN’T

IT JUST ISN’T HERE ARE THE HEAD TO HEAD HERE ARE THE HEAD TO HEAD NACHOS, PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES NACHOS, PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES HE IS CONSISTENTLY ON THE POLL HE IS CONSISTENTLY ON THE POLL NEAR THE TOP OF OFTEN OF THEM NEAR THE TOP OF OFTEN OF THEM

THE MORE CHARACTERIZED IS BIDEN THE MORE CHARACTERIZED IS BIDEN HIS CAMPAIGN HAS RAISED MORE HIS CAMPAIGN HAS RAISED MORE MONEY MONEY HIS CAMPAIGN’S CASH ON HAND MORE HIS CAMPAIGN’S CASH ON HAND MORE THAN DOUBLED THE NONBILLIONAIRE THAN DOUBLED THE NONBILLIONAIRE CANDIDATES

CANDIDATES HIS ABILITY TO RAISE MONEY IS HIS ABILITY TO RAISE MONEY IS NOTHING TO ELECTABILITY BEING NOTHING TO ELECTABILITY BEING DROPPED ON HIS HEAD DROPPED ON HIS HEAD THERE ARE SWING CONGRESSIONAL THERE ARE SWING CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS IN CONGRESS WHO REALLY MEMBERS IN CONGRESS WHO REALLY DO WORRY ABOUT SANDERS’ EFFECTS DO WORRY ABOUT SANDERS’ EFFECTS ON THEM, BEING DRAGGED DOWN ON THEM, BEING DRAGGED DOWN ABOUT BOUND BALLOT ABOUT BOUND BALLOT

I DEFINITELY HEARD THAT A LOT IN I DEFINITELY HEARD THAT A LOT IN 2016 FROM A LOT OF SWING 2016 FROM A LOT OF SWING REPUBLICAN MEMBERS AS POLITICAL REPUBLICAN MEMBERS AS POLITICAL SCIENTIST POINTS OUT, THOSE SCIENTIST POINTS OUT, THOSE FEARS ABOUT DOWN BALLOT DRAGS FEARS ABOUT DOWN BALLOT DRAGS MIGHT BE OVERSTATED MIGHT BE OVERSTATED WE’LL SEE WE’LL SEE LEFT WING CANDIDATES SOMETIMES LEFT WING CANDIDATES SOMETIMES LOSE

LOSE THEY GET DRUGS THEY GET DRUGS GEORGE McGOVERN WASN’T A GEORGE McGOVERN WASN’T A LIBERAL, BUT HE LOST IN A LIBERAL, BUT HE LOST IN A LANDSLIDE DEFEAT AGAINST NIXON LANDSLIDE DEFEAT AGAINST NIXON

THAT’S A TRAUM THAT’S A TRAUM THAT’S THAT’S THAT’S THAT’S THAT’S A TRAUMA THAT HAS STAYED THAT’S A TRAUMA THAT HAS STAYED WITH OLDER GENERATIONS, WITH OLDER GENERATIONS, UNDERSTANDABLY SO UNDERSTANDABLY SO IF YOU CAN SHOW WHERE SANDERS IS IF YOU CAN SHOW WHERE SANDERS IS BEHIND AND HEAD TO HEAD MATCH UP BEHIND AND HEAD TO HEAD MATCH UP WITH TRUMP, THERE IS A REASON TO WITH TRUMP, THERE IS A REASON TO WORRY WORRY IT’S NOT WHAT THE DATA SAYS

IT’S NOT WHAT THE DATA SAYS IF YOU DON’T THINK HEED BE GOOD IF YOU DON’T THINK HEED BE GOOD PRESIDENT, YOU SHOULD ACT ON PRESIDENT, YOU SHOULD ACT ON THAT AS AID SIT IS NOT THAT AS AID SIT IS NOT BUT IF YOU ARE FREAKING OUT BUT IF YOU ARE FREAKING OUT BECAUSE HE IS SO OBVIOUSLY AN

Source: Youtube