Ex-FBI Lawyer Speaks Out After Trump Attack That 'Broke The Camel’s Back' | The Last Word | MSNBC

>>> HERE’S SOMETHING NO ONE IN >>> HERE’S SOMETHING NO ONE IN THE TRUMP FAMILY HAS EVER THE TRUMP FAMILY HAS EVER THOUGHT OR SAID THOUGHT OR SAID

FROM VERY EARLY ON, I KNEW I FROM VERY EARLY ON, I KNEW I WANTED TO WORK FOR THE WANTED TO WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT AND MAKE THE WORLD A GOVERNMENT AND MAKE THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE BETTER PLACE LISA PAGE SAID THAT IN HER VERY LISA PAGE SAID THAT IN HER VERY FIRST PUBLIC COMMENTS ABOUT HER FIRST PUBLIC COMMENTS ABOUT HER YEARS OF BEING ATTACKED BY THE YEARS OF BEING ATTACKED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES FORMER FBI LAWYER LISA PAGE FORMER FBI LAWYER LISA PAGE BROKE HER PUBLIC SILENCE WITH BROKE HER PUBLIC SILENCE WITH OUR NEXT GUEST, MOLLY JONG-FAST OUR NEXT GUEST, MOLLY JONG-FAST IN THAT INTERVIEW LISA PAGE SAID IN THAT INTERVIEW LISA PAGE SAID SOMETHING THAT NO ONE HAS EVER SOMETHING THAT NO ONE HAS EVER SAID ABOUT ANY PRESIDENT OF THE SAID ABOUT ANY PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES UNTIL NOW

UNITED STATES UNTIL NOW HONESTLY, HIS DEMEANING FAKE HONESTLY, HIS DEMEANING FAKE ORGASM WAS REALLY THE STRAW THAT ORGASM WAS REALLY THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL’S BACK BROKE THE CAMEL’S BACK THIS IS WHAT LISA PAGE WAS THIS IS WHAT LISA PAGE WAS REFERRING TO REFERRING TO

>> LISA PAGE >> LISA PAGE WHAT A GROUP WHAT A GROUP SHE’S GOING TO WIN

SHE’S GOING TO WIN 10 MILLION TO 1 SHE’S GOING TO 10 MILLION TO 1 SHE’S GOING TO WIN, I’M TELLING YOU, PETER, WIN, I’M TELLING YOU, PETER, SHE’S GOING TO WIN, PETER, OH I SHE’S GOING TO WIN, PETER, OH I LOVE YOU SO MUCH LOVE YOU SO MUCH I LOVE YOU, PETER! I LOVE YOU, PETER! I LOVE YOU TOO, LISA! I LOVE YOU TOO, LISA! LISA, I LOVE YOU, LISA, LISA, OH LISA, I LOVE YOU, LISA, LISA, OH GOD I LOVE YOU, LISA — GOD I LOVE YOU, LISA — >> AND THAT’S THE MOMENT THAT >> AND THAT’S THE MOMENT THAT CHANGED EVERYTHING FOR LISA CHANGED EVERYTHING FOR LISA PAGE, ACCORDING TO MOLLY PAGE, ACCORDING TO MOLLY JONG-FAST’S REPORT IN "THE DAILY JONG-FAST’S REPORT IN "THE DAILY BEAST" BEAST

" SHE SAID, I HAD STAYED QUIET FOR SHE SAID, I HAD STAYED QUIET FOR YEARS HOPING IT WOULD FADE AWAY, YEARS HOPING IT WOULD FADE AWAY, BUT INSTEAD IT GOT WORSE, IT HAD BUT INSTEAD IT GOT WORSE, IT HAD BEEN SO HARD NOT TO DEFEND BEEN SO HARD NOT TO DEFEND MYSELF, TO LET PEOPLE WHO HATE MYSELF, TO LET PEOPLE WHO HATE ME CONTROL THE NARRATIVE, I ME CONTROL THE NARRATIVE, I DECIDED TO TAKE MY POWER BACK DECIDED TO TAKE MY POWER BACK JOINING US IS MOLLY JONG-FAST, JOINING US IS MOLLY JONG-FAST, WHOSE ARTICLE IN "THE DAILY WHOSE ARTICLE IN "THE DAILY BEAST" IS ENTITLED "LISA PAGE BEAST" IS ENTITLED "LISA PAGE SPEAKS" SPEAKS" MOLLY, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US

MOLLY, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US IT’S AN EXTRAORDINARY PIECE IT’S AN EXTRAORDINARY PIECE WE’VE BEEN WONDERING ABOUT THIS WE’VE BEEN WONDERING ABOUT THIS WOMAN FOR YEARS AS THE PRESIDENT WOMAN FOR YEARS AS THE PRESIDENT ATTACKS HER ON A DAILY BASIS ATTACKS HER ON A DAILY BASIS

AND HERE SHE IS FINALLY TELLING AND HERE SHE IS FINALLY TELLING US NOT ONLY HOW SHE’S FELT ABOUT US NOT ONLY HOW SHE’S FELT ABOUT IT, BUT WHY SHE CAME OUT, THAT IT, BUT WHY SHE CAME OUT, THAT MOMENT, JUST IN OCTOBER, WHEN MOMENT, JUST IN OCTOBER, WHEN THE VULGARIAN IN CHIEF DOES THE VULGARIAN IN CHIEF DOES SOMETHING WE’VE NEVER SEEN SOMETHING WE’VE NEVER SEEN BEFORE BEFORE >> IT WAS AN AMAZING MOMENT TO >> IT WAS AN AMAZING MOMENT TO SIT WITH HER TWO WEEKS LATER AND SIT WITH HER TWO WEEKS LATER AND TO HEAR HER TELL ME THAT THAT TO HEAR HER TELL ME THAT THAT WAS THE THING THAT MADE HER WAS THE THING THAT MADE HER DECIDE SHE WAS GOING TO TAKE IT DECIDE SHE WAS GOING TO TAKE IT BACK BACK I MEAN, I FELT VERY HONORED TO I MEAN, I FELT VERY HONORED TO GET TO BE A PART OF THAT MOMENT

GET TO BE A PART OF THAT MOMENT >> AND JUST FOR THE RECORD, FOR >> AND JUST FOR THE RECORD, FOR THE AUDIENCE, HER OFFENSE THE AUDIENCE, HER OFFENSE AGAINST DONALD TRUMP IS THAT SHE AGAINST DONALD TRUMP IS THAT SHE WAS, IN 2016, DURING THE WAS, IN 2016, DURING THE PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN, WATCHING PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN, WATCHING THE MOST INCOMPETENT, LEAST THE MOST INCOMPETENT, LEAST INFORMED PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE INFORMED PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN HISTORY, SHE WATCHED HIM WITH IN HISTORY, SHE WATCHED HIM WITH FEAR, LIKE MOST OF AMERICANS, FEAR, LIKE MOST OF AMERICANS, AND LIKE MOST AMERICANS, SHE AND LIKE MOST AMERICANS, SHE DIDN’T WANT HIM TO BE PRESIDENT DIDN’T WANT HIM TO BE PRESIDENT AND SHE PRIVATELY COMMUNICATED AND SHE PRIVATELY COMMUNICATED THAT WITH OTHERS AND TEXTS OF THAT WITH OTHERS AND TEXTS OF THAT PRIVATE COMMUNICATION THAT PRIVATE COMMUNICATION EVENTUALLY BECAME PUBLIC, EVENTUALLY BECAME PUBLIC, INCLUDING PRIVATE COMMUNICATION INCLUDING PRIVATE COMMUNICATION WITH HER — A FORMER LOVER OF WITH HER — A FORMER LOVER OF HERS AT THE FBI HERS AT THE FBI

THEY HAD A RIGHT TO THAT PRIVATE THEY HAD A RIGHT TO THAT PRIVATE COMMUNICATION, THEY HAD A RIGHT COMMUNICATION, THEY HAD A RIGHT TO THE PERSONAL VIEW THAT DONALD TO THE PERSONAL VIEW THAT DONALD TRUMP SHOULD NOT BE PRESIDENT, TRUMP SHOULD NOT BE PRESIDENT, WOULD BE A BAD PRESIDENT, THEY WOULD BE A BAD PRESIDENT, THEY WERE COMPLETELY RIGHT ABOUT WERE COMPLETELY RIGHT ABOUT THAT THAT >> RIGHT >> RIGHT >> AND DONALD TRUMP HAS ATTACKED >> AND DONALD TRUMP HAS ATTACKED HER AND OTHERS AS IF THEY HAD NO HER AND OTHERS AS IF THEY HAD NO RIGHT TO EVER THINK THAT HE RIGHT TO EVER THINK THAT HE WOULD BE A BAD PRESIDENT

WOULD BE A BAD PRESIDENT >> WELL, THE ONLY POSSIBLE LAW >> WELL, THE ONLY POSSIBLE LAW THAT THEY COULD HAVE BROKEN THAT THEY COULD HAVE BROKEN WOULD BE THE HATCH ACT WOULD BE THE HATCH ACT AND THEY THEY DIDN’T BREAK THE H AND THEY THEY DIDN’T BREAK THE H ACT ACT

BUT IRONICALLY, KELLYANNE CONWAY BUT IRONICALLY, KELLYANNE CONWAY BREAKS THE HATCH ACT ALL THE BREAKS THE HATCH ACT ALL THE TIME TIME >> HE TAKES >> HE TAKES >> SO THEY’RE ALWAYS OBSESSED >> SO THEY’RE ALWAYS OBSESSED WITH SAYING THAT PEOPLE ARE WITH SAYING THAT PEOPLE ARE DOING THE THINGS THAT THEY’RE DOING THE THINGS THAT THEY’RE ACTUALLY DOING

ACTUALLY DOING >> HATCH ACT IS PUBLICLY >> HATCH ACT IS PUBLICLY ADVOCATING FOR A CLIENT WHICH ADVOCATING FOR A CLIENT WHICH GOVERNMENT WORKERS CAN’T , DO GOVERNMENT WORKERS CAN’T , DO WHICH SPERMSZ DO WHICH SPERMSZ DO AND THEN THE ISSUE BECOMES WAS AND THEN THE ISSUE BECOMES WAS HER JUDGMENT IN ANY OF THE HER JUDGMENT IN ANY OF THE ELEMENTS INVOLVING THE ELEMENTS INVOLVING THE INVESTIGATION OF THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION OF THE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN OUR ELECTION, INTERFERENCE IN OUR ELECTION, WAS IT COLORED BY THE FACT THAT WAS IT COLORED BY THE FACT THAT SHE DIDN’T WANT DONALD TRUMP TO SHE DIDN’T WANT DONALD TRUMP TO BE PRESIDENT AND WE HAVE NO BE PRESIDENT AND WE HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF THAT? EVIDENCE OF THAT? SHE’S BEEN TOTALLY EXONERATED SHE’S BEEN TOTALLY EXONERATED

THIS IG REPORT WILL EXONERATE THIS IG REPORT WILL EXONERATE HER FURTHER BECAUSE WE’VE SEEN HER FURTHER BECAUSE WE’VE SEEN IT IN THE LINKS IT IN THE LINKS WHY DID THE PRESIDENT — WHY WHY DID THE PRESIDENT — WHY WERE THESE TEXT MESSAGES LEAKED WERE THESE TEXT MESSAGES LEAKED AND HOW DOES THE PRESIDENT USE AND HOW DOES THE PRESIDENT USE WOMEN TO DISTRACT? WOMEN TO DISTRACT? HOW DOES HE GET HIS BASE ALL HOW DOES HE GET HIS BASE ALL GINNED UP WITH MISOGYNY, AND WE GINNED UP WITH MISOGYNY, AND WE SEE IT AGAIN AND AGAIN AND SEE IT AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN, YOU KNOW AGAIN, YOU KNOW >> IT ALMOST SEEMS LIKE HE WOULD >> IT ALMOST SEEMS LIKE HE WOULD HAVE TO INVENT A LISA PAGE IF HE HAVE TO INVENT A LISA PAGE IF HE DIDN’T HAVE ONE

DIDN’T HAVE ONE >> OR A CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD OR >> OR A CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD OR MARIE YOVANOVITCH MARIE YOVANOVITCH IT’S JUST THIS CONTINUAL WOMEN IT’S JUST THIS CONTINUAL WOMEN THAT HE FINDS TO USE, TO ABUSE THAT HE FINDS TO USE, TO ABUSE

>> AND YOU SEE — AND YOUR >> AND YOU SEE — AND YOUR REPORTING INDICATES THAT FOR REPORTING INDICATES THAT FOR DONALD TRUMP THERE’S EXTRA FUEL DONALD TRUMP THERE’S EXTRA FUEL IN THIS WHEN IT’S A WOMAN HE’S IN THIS WHEN IT’S A WOMAN HE’S ATTACKING ATTACKING >> YEAH >> YEAH AND I THINK THERE’S THIS WEIRD AND I THINK THERE’S THIS WEIRD SEXUAL ANGLE, LIKE THE LOVER, SEXUAL ANGLE, LIKE THE LOVER, LISA PAGE

LISA PAGE BUT HE GETS MORE INVOLVED IN THE BUT HE GETS MORE INVOLVED IN THE NARRATIVE WHEN IT’S A WOMAN NARRATIVE WHEN IT’S A WOMAN I AM ALWAYS SHOCKED I AM ALWAYS SHOCKED

LIKE, WE SAW WITH E JEAN LIKE, WE SAW WITH E JEAN CARROLL CARROLL I WROTE ABOUT HER

I WROTE ABOUT HER HE JUST WENT AFTER HER HE JUST WENT AFTER HER THIS IS MY FAVORITE TRUMP THINGS THIS IS MY FAVORITE TRUMP THINGS HE DOES HE DOES

I MEAN NO DISRESPECT I MEAN NO DISRESPECT >> HE USES THAT PHRASE >> HE USES THAT PHRASE >> RIGHT

>> RIGHT THAT DOESN’T NEGATE THE THAT DOESN’T NEGATE THE DISRESPECT DISRESPECT >> WHAT DID YOU FIND — WHO IS >> WHAT DID YOU FIND — WHO IS THIS WOMAN, LISA PAGE, WHO YOU THIS WOMAN, LISA PAGE, WHO YOU SPENT TIME WITH? SPENT TIME WITH? >> SHE’S AMAZING >> SHE’S AMAZING

SHE’S COMPLETELY SELF-MADE SHE’S COMPLETELY SELF-MADE SHE WAS ONE OF THE ONLY WOMEN — SHE WAS ONE OF THE ONLY WOMEN — SHE WAS THE ONLY WOMAN IN HER SHE WAS THE ONLY WOMAN IN HER DOJ HONORS COURSE DOJ HONORS COURSE SHE’S JUST A VERY EXTRAORDINARY, SHE’S JUST A VERY EXTRAORDINARY, SMART WOMAN

SMART WOMAN ANDY McCABE THOUGHT — HE REALLY ANDY McCABE THOUGHT — HE REALLY TRUSTED HER WITH EVERYTHING TRUSTED HER WITH EVERYTHING AND SHE’S A LAWYER AND SHE’S AND SHE’S A LAWYER AND SHE’S VERY LAWYERLY VERY LAWYERLY

SHE SPEAKS JUST — SHE’S JUST SHE SPEAKS JUST — SHE’S JUST REALLY A GREAT PERSON REALLY A GREAT PERSON >> "THE DAILY BEAST" HAS THE >> "THE DAILY BEAST" HAS THE PIECE PIECE IT IS SUCH AN HONOR TO HAVE YOU IT IS SUCH AN HONOR TO HAVE YOU HERE

HERE I’VE BEEN FOLLOWING YOUR

Source: Youtube